YouTuber says SEC will recommend dropping lawsuit over 2018 token ICO


Update (9:59 pm UTC): This article has been updated to include a response from SEC.

A YouTuber with token Matrix CEO Ian Balina and a YouTuber with over 100,000 customers said that the US Securities and Exchange Commission will stop chasing them in court by violating securities laws by promoting Sparkster (SPRK) tokens in 2018.

Speaking to Cointelegraph on 11 March, Balina said that SEC had informed him that it was planning to reject a case filed in 2022, alleging that “Crypto Asset Securities in 2018 in 2018 is offered offering and promotion.”

According to Crypto YouTuber, SEC’s action was based on change in administration’s priorities – referring to US President Donald Trump, appointing SEC President Mark Uyda after Gary Jensor’s departure in January.

“Obviously, the new administration is pro-crypto,” Balina said, claiming that the time has “ended” for crypto regulation through enforcement.

Politics, security, sec, ICO

Balina is speaking about Sparkster on YouTube in 2018. Source: Ian Balina

The SEC complaint against Balina filed in September 2022, alleged that Utubar agreed to receive a 30% bonus from Sparkster, which offered a $ $ 5 million token bought in the initial coin offer (ICO) – but did not reveal this information to his social media followers. In one of the decisions of the last important court, a judge stated in May 2024 that the SPRK tokens are “qualified as securities” within the purview of SEC.

At the time of the 2024 decision, Balina’s legal team said it planned to appeal. The judge initially set the date of the jury trial on January 1, 2025, but approved the July 2024 proposal for a continuity and agreed to schedule the proceedings at the later date. At the time of publication, there was no filing on the dock in the US district court for the western district of Texas, requesting to dismiss the case. In response to an investigation from cointelegraph, SEC refused to comment on the case.

“It was definitely not cheap, spends a lot of money in case of legal fees, which is definitely useless,” Balina said. “I think SEC did not prioritize all this.”