Analysts said India’s annual oil import bill could increase by $ 9–11 billion if the country is forced to move away from Russian crude in response to American threats of additional tariffs or fine on Indian exports, said analysts.
India, the world’s third largest oil consumer and importer, has taken significant benefits by replacing rapid market-price oil with rapid Russian rawness after Western restrictions on Moscow after the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Russian oil, which was less than 0.2% of India’s imports before the war, now makes 35–40% of the country’s raw raw intake, helps reduce overall energy import costs, keeps retail fuel prices in examination, and involves inflation.
Editorial | Sour relation: 25% on Tram’s tariff, ‘penalty’
The influx of concessional Russian crude enabled India to refine oil and export petroleum products, including countries that have banned direct imports from Russia. The twin strategy of Indian oil companies is posting record profits.
However, now US President Donald Trump is in danger after announcing 25% tariffs on Indian goods and announced an unspecified punishment for purchasing Russian oil and weapons. 25% tariff has been reported since then, but the fine has not been specified yet.
The European Union, which ban the import of sophisticated products obtained from Russian-origin crude, presents a double vaimi for Indian refiners.
Sumit Ritolia, the lead research analyst (refining and modeling) in the Global Real-Time data and analytics provider KPLER called it “a squeeze” from both ends.
European Union’s sanctions – Effective from January 2026 – can force Indian refiners to a raw intake segment from one side, and on the other hand, the US tariff threat increases the possibility of secondary restrictions that will directly hit shipping, insurance and financing lines to reduce India’s Russian oil trade.
“Together, these measures rapidly increase India’s raw procurement flexibility, take compliance risk, and show significant cost uncertainty,” he said.
The final financial year, India spent more than $ 137 billion on crude oil imports, refined in fuel like petrol and diesel.
For refiners such as Reliance Industries Limited and Nair Energy – which collectively accounts for 1.7–2.0 million barrels (BPD) of 1.7–2.0 million barrels (more than 50% in 2025) of 1.7–2.0 million barrels (BPD) of Russian raw imports in India.
While Nair is supported by Russian oil giant Rosneft and approved by the European Union last month, Reliance has been a large fuel exporter to Europe.
As one of the world’s largest diesel exporters – and with the total sophisticated product exports in Europe, about 200,000 BPD in 2024 and 185,000 BPD in 2025 – Reliance has used large -scale concessional Russian crude to promote refining margin in the last two years.
Mr. Ritolia said, “Strict original-tracking requirements now forces Reliance either to prevent its intake of Russian feedstock, probably affects cost competition, or re-affects Russian-linked products in non-European Union markets,” said Mr. Ritolia.
However, Reliance’s dual-refinery structure-a domestic-centered unit and an export-oriented campus-serenical flexibility. It can allocate non-Russian crude into its export-oriented refinery and continue to meet the European Union compliance standards, processing the Russian barrels in the domestic unit for other markets.
Although redirecting diesel exports in Southeast Asia, Africa, or Latin America is possible operating, such an innings will increase narrow margin, prolonged travel time, and demand variability, which will make it commercially less optimal, he said.
The KPler data shows a significant decline in India’s Russian raw imports in July (1.8 million BPD vs. 2.1 million BPD in June), aligning with seasonal refinery maintenance and weak monsoon-driven demand. However, the drop is more pronounced among the refiners operated by the state, reflecting increasing compliance between increasing geopolitical risk.
Private refinors, who eat for more than 50 percent of Russian raw raw intake, have also begun to reduce the exposure, with fresh procurement diversification this week intensifies concerns over US sanctions this week.
Mr. Ritolia said that Russian crude is not plug-and-play instead. The Middle East is a logical decline, but there are obstacles – a mismatch in constructive lock -in, pricing rigidity, and raw quality that affects product yield and refinery configuration.
He said, “The risk here is not only supply, but beneficial. Refiners will face high feedstock costs, and (Russian) in the case of complex units adapted to mixtures such as urals, even margin will be under pressure,” he said.
In the future curriculum, KPler believes that India’s complex private refiner-firm business weapons and flexible configurations-East-East-East, West Africa, Latin America, or even expected to be pivered from America to a non-Russian barrels, where economics permit permits.
This change, while operationally possible, will align with gradual and strategically developed regulatory structures, contract structures and margin mobility.
However, a full -fledged Russian barrel is not an easy achievement – logically challenging, economically painful, and geologically frightening. Supply replacement may be possible on paper, but is frightening in practice.
“Economically, the implications are largely. Losing $ 5 per barrel discount in 1.8 million BPD, India can increase its import bill from $ 9–11 billion annually. If the prices of global flats may rise higher due to decrease in Russian availability, the cost may increase,” it has been said.
This will increase fiscal tension, especially if the government steps to stabilize the prices of retail fuel. It would be difficult to ignore the cascading effect on inflation, currency and monetary policy.
